8 Best DeepSeek Alternatives in 2026
DeepSeek made waves when it launched its R1 model in early 2025, offering surprisingly capable AI at very low cost. But as its popularity grew, so did serious concerns about data privacy, government censorship, and national security risks. Today, millions of users and organizations are actively searching for reliable DeepSeek alternatives that deliver strong AI performance without the geopolitical baggage. For a deeper look, see our roundup of ChatGPT alternatives.
In this guide, we cover the eight best DeepSeek alternatives available in 2026 — from the most popular commercial chatbots to privacy-first and open-source options. Each pick includes a full breakdown of features, pricing, and ideal use cases so you can make an informed decision. If you’re exploring options, check out our guide to best AI chatbots.
If you want a broader view of the AI landscape, our complete AI chatbot rankings for 2026 covers over 20 tools in detail.
Why People Are Looking for DeepSeek Alternatives
DeepSeek is a product of Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence, a Chinese company. While its models are technically impressive, its privacy policy and data practices have alarmed researchers, governments, and everyday users alike.
Data Storage in China
DeepSeek explicitly stores all user data — including chat logs, device information, IP addresses, and behavioral data — on servers located in the People’s Republic of China. Under Chinese law, including the 2017 National Intelligence Law and the 2021 Data Security Law, Chinese authorities can compel any company to hand over data on demand. This is not a hypothetical risk; it is baked into the legal framework governing DeepSeek’s operations.
Hidden Code and Security Vulnerabilities
Cybersecurity firm Feroot Security discovered hidden code in DeepSeek capable of transmitting user data to China Mobile’s infrastructure — a state-controlled telecom company previously delisted from the New York Stock Exchange over security concerns. Security researchers at NowSecure also found that the app transmitted unencrypted data and stored it alongside ByteDance data centers.
Censorship and Content Filtering
DeepSeek refuses to discuss or actively distorts responses about politically sensitive topics in China, including Tiananmen Square, Uyghur persecution, and criticism of the Chinese Communist Party. This is not a quirk — it reflects content policies aligned with Chinese government requirements.
Global Bans and Government Action
Australia, the Czech Republic, South Korea, and Italy have all taken action against DeepSeek on national security or data privacy grounds. Germany asked Apple and Google to remove the app from their stores. A U.S. Congressional report concluded that DeepSeek “siphons data back to the PRC, creates security vulnerabilities, and covertly censors information.”
Given these concerns, the question is not whether to find an alternative, but which one is the right fit. We also compare DeepSeek head-to-head with its main rival in our DeepSeek vs ChatGPT 2026 comparison. If you’re exploring options, check out our guide to DeepSeek vs ChatGPT.
Quick Comparison: Best DeepSeek Alternatives in 2026
| Alternative | Best For | Free Tier | Paid Plan Starts At | Privacy | Our Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | All-purpose use | Yes (GPT-4o mini) | $8/mo (Go) | Good | 9.2/10 |
| Claude | Privacy + long documents | Yes (limited) | $20/mo (Pro) | Excellent | 9.0/10 |
| Gemini | Google Workspace users | Yes (2.5 Flash) | $19.99/mo (AI Pro) | Good | 8.7/10 |
| Mistral AI | European privacy compliance | Yes (Le Chat) | Custom (Pro) | Excellent | 8.5/10 |
| Llama (Meta) | Self-hosting, developers | Yes (open weights) | $0 (self-hosted) | You control it | 8.4/10 |
| Qwen (Alibaba) | Cost efficiency, coding | Yes | $0 (open weights) | Moderate* | 7.8/10 |
| Perplexity AI | Research, cited answers | Yes (limited) | $20/mo (Pro) | Good | 8.6/10 |
| Grok | Real-time data, X users | Limited (via X) | $30/mo (Premium) | Moderate | 8.0/10 |
*Qwen is Alibaba-based (China). Self-hosted deployments may address privacy concerns for technical users.
1. ChatGPT — Best All-Purpose DeepSeek Alternative
ChatGPT, built by OpenAI, remains the most widely used AI assistant in the world. In 2026, it has grown into a comprehensive platform that covers everything from coding and writing to research, image generation, and complex multi-step agentic tasks. If you are coming from DeepSeek and want the most capable and recognizable replacement, ChatGPT is the natural starting point.
Key Features
- GPT-5.2 models: The latest generation includes GPT-5.2 Instant, Thinking, and Pro modes, with significant improvements in reasoning and instruction-following over previous versions.
- DALL-E image generation built directly into paid plans.
- Advanced Voice Mode for natural spoken conversation.
- Deep Research: An agentic feature on Pro and higher plans that autonomously browses the web, reads files, and delivers cited reports with up to 250 runs per month on the Pro plan.
- Custom GPTs: Create and share tailored AI assistants from within the platform.
- Codex coding agent for automated software development tasks.
Pricing
- Free: Access to GPT-4o mini, basic web browsing, file uploads. Ad-supported in the free tier.
- Go — ~$8/month: Expanded access to GPT-5.2 Instant, 10x more messages than free, longer memory. Note: includes ads.
- Plus — $20/month: Full access to GPT-4o, o1, and GPT-5.2 Thinking. Ad-free. DALL-E image generation. Custom GPTs.
- Pro — $200/month: Unlimited GPT-4o, maximum model access, 250 Deep Research runs/month, priority access to new features.
- Teams — $25–$30/user/month with SOC 2 compliance and admin controls.
Privacy
OpenAI is a US-based company subject to US law. Paid accounts (Plus and above) offer the option to opt out of having your conversations used for model training. Enterprise plans come with stronger data handling guarantees and no training on customer data by default.
Best For
Individuals and businesses looking for a powerful, well-supported all-in-one AI platform. ChatGPT’s breadth of features and ecosystem of integrations makes it suitable for almost any use case.
See how it stacks up in our full ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek comparison.
2. Claude — Best for Privacy and Long-Context Tasks
Claude, made by Anthropic, is widely considered the most privacy-conscious of the major commercial AI assistants. Built on Constitutional AI principles, Claude is designed to be honest and to avoid harmful outputs without relying on heavy-handed filtering. For users and organizations moving away from DeepSeek specifically because of data concerns, Claude is arguably the most compelling choice.
Key Features
- Claude Opus 4.6 (released February 2026): Anthropic’s flagship model with support for agent teams, automatic context compaction for effectively infinite conversations, and major improvements in reasoning and coding.
- 200,000-token context window on paid plans, excellent for processing long documents, legal contracts, codebases, and research papers.
- Extended Thinking: Available across Claude Sonnet, Opus, and Haiku — lets the model reason through complex problems step by step before responding.
- Artifacts: Generates interactive outputs like code snippets, documents, and mini-apps that you can edit directly in the interface.
- Cowork: An agentic feature (available to Pro and Max users) that lets Claude autonomously complete multi-step tasks like organizing research, analyzing datasets, and coordinating workflows.
- Claude Code: A terminal-based coding agent ideal for professional developers.
Pricing
- Free: Access to Claude 4.5 with message limits that can be hit quickly under heavy use.
- Pro — $20/month: 5x usage limits versus free, full access to Claude Opus 4.6 and Cowork.
- Max — $100/month or $200/month: 10x or 20x the usage of Pro, ideal for developers using Claude Code for large-scale coding projects.
- Teams — $25/seat/month (annual) or $30/month billed monthly, minimum 5 seats.
- Enterprise: Custom pricing with SSO, SCIM, audit logs, and expanded context windows.
Privacy
Anthropic is a US-based company. Claude’s privacy defaults are strong: the Pro plan includes explicit controls ensuring your content is not used for model training. Anthropic’s Constitutional AI approach also means Claude is less likely to produce manipulated or politically filtered responses — a direct contrast to DeepSeek’s censorship issues.
Best For
Privacy-conscious users, legal and compliance professionals, researchers handling long documents, and developers who need a highly capable coding assistant with strong ethical guardrails.
Read our detailed Claude vs ChatGPT 2026 comparison to see how they compare directly.
3. Gemini — Best for Google Workspace Integration
Google’s Gemini is the go-to DeepSeek alternative for anyone deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem. It combines strong multimodal AI capabilities with native integration into Gmail, Google Docs, Sheets, Drive, and Google Meet — making it uniquely useful for productivity workflows rather than just standalone chat.
Key Features
- Gemini 3 Pro and Deep Think: Google’s most capable model in 2026, supporting 1 million token context windows and advanced reasoning modes.
- Deep Research: An agentic feature that autonomously conducts multi-step web research and compiles comprehensive reports with citations.
- Google Workspace integration: Gemini AI Pro unlocks AI-powered features directly inside Gmail (email drafting, summarization), Docs (writing assistance), and Sheets (data analysis).
- Gemini Live: A conversational real-time AI mode for natural, fluid spoken interactions.
- NotebookLM Advanced: Included with AI Pro — a powerful research tool for summarizing and analyzing large document sets.
- Veo 3.1 video generation on Ultra tier.
- Agent Mode: Available to Ultra subscribers in the US, enabling autonomous task execution across Google services.
Pricing
- Free: Access to Gemini 2.5 Flash, limited Gemini 2.5 Pro access, basic Deep Research and Gemini Live, 100 monthly AI credits for video tools.
- Google AI Pro — $19.99/month: Full Gemini 3 Pro access, 1M token context window, 1,000 monthly AI credits, Workspace AI features, NotebookLM Advanced. College students can get a free year.
- Google AI Ultra — Custom high-tier pricing: Highest model limits, Veo 3.1, Deep Think, Agent Mode (US only), 30 TB storage.
- Workspace Business — $20/seat/month: Team collaboration with Gemini in Workspace apps.
- Workspace Enterprise — $30/seat/month: Advanced security, translated meeting captions, data classification tools.
Privacy
Google is a US company. Data handling depends on your account type and settings. Workspace Business and Enterprise plans come with stronger data protections and, critically, Google does not use Workspace customer data to train its AI models by default.
Best For
Teams and individuals who rely heavily on Google Workspace. The tight integration with Gmail, Docs, and Sheets provides productivity gains that standalone chatbots simply cannot match.
4. Mistral AI — Best European Open-Source Alternative
Mistral AI is a French AI company founded in 2023 by former researchers from DeepMind and Meta. With a current valuation of $13.7 billion, it has established itself as Europe’s leading AI model provider and a powerful open-source counterweight to both US-based closed systems and Chinese AI like DeepSeek.
For European users and businesses subject to GDPR, Mistral offers something rare: a capable AI platform built under European data law, with full open-weight models available for local deployment.
Key Features
- Open-weight models: Mistral Large 3, Mistral Medium 3, Codestral, Pixtral, and Magistral are all freely available for local hosting and fine-tuning. No vendor lock-in.
- 256,000-token context windows across several models — sufficient for very large codebases and document sets.
- Multilingual and multimodal: Pixtral adds vision and OCR capabilities; models support dozens of languages natively.
- Codestral is a specialized coding model that competes directly with GitHub Copilot for developer productivity.
- Le Chat: Mistral’s consumer chat interface includes a free tier with flash answers, code interpreter, document uploads, and AFP-verified news search — notably more generous than most rivals’ free tiers.
- Le Chat Pro adds extended thinking, deep research reports, up to 15 GB document storage, and 1,000 projects.
- Zero Data Retention: Available on Team and Enterprise plans — your data is processed ephemerally and never stored.
Pricing
- Free (Le Chat): Flash answers, document uploads, code interpreter, AFP-verified news, roughly 25 messages per session.
- Pro Plan: Enhanced usage limits, extended thinking, deep research, 15 GB storage.
- Team Plan: 200 flash answers/user/day, 30 GB storage/user, domain verification, collaborative workspace.
- Enterprise: Custom pricing, typically $20,000+ per month for private or on-premises deployments with full audit logs and agent builders.
- API pricing: Mistral Large 3 at $2.00/$5.00 per million tokens (input/output); Mistral Medium 3 at $0.40/$2.00 — among the most competitive rates in the market.
Privacy
As a French company, Mistral operates under GDPR. It is the strongest privacy choice for European users looking to replace DeepSeek. Zero Data Retention on paid plans means conversations are not stored. Open-weight models can be fully self-hosted, giving organizations complete data sovereignty.
Best For
European businesses requiring GDPR compliance, developers who want open-weight models for fine-tuning and local deployment, and organizations that need a cost-effective alternative to expensive proprietary APIs.
5. Llama (Meta) — Best Open-Source Self-Hostable Option
Meta’s Llama series is the most widely used family of open-weight AI models in the world. Unlike every other option on this list, Llama is not a service — it is a set of model weights that you can download, run, and deploy entirely on your own infrastructure. For organizations that cannot accept third-party data handling of any kind, Llama is the gold standard.
Key Features
- Llama 4 (released April 2025): A family of three models — Scout, Maverick, and Behemoth — all built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture. Scout has 17 billion active parameters and a 10 million token context window. Maverick offers a 1 million token context window.
- Natively multimodal: All Llama 4 models support text, image, and video input, trained across 200 languages.
- Self-hostable on commodity hardware: Scout runs on a single Nvidia H100 GPU. Maverick also fits on a single GPU host. This makes self-hosting genuinely accessible for mid-size companies.
- Commercial license with no revenue restrictions: Organizations with under 700 million monthly users can deploy Llama commercially without paying royalties.
- Broad ecosystem: Available through AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Groq, Databricks, NVIDIA, Snowflake, and 25+ other partners.
- Community-driven optimization: Companies like Cerebras and Groq have developed hardware-specific enhancements for Llama, pushing performance beyond what official benchmarks show.
Pricing
- Self-hosted: $0 for model weights. You pay only for your own compute infrastructure. Cost-effective above 5–10 million tokens per month compared to any paid API.
- Cloud API access: Available through multiple providers. Typical rates are $2–$5 per million tokens depending on provider and model size.
- Hardware requirements: 8B models need ~16 GB VRAM; 70B models need ~80 GB VRAM; 405B models require approximately 320 GB VRAM (four A100s or two H100s).
Privacy
Full data sovereignty when self-hosted — no data ever leaves your servers. This is the definitive answer for organizations that need absolute control over their AI data pipeline.
Best For
Enterprises with technical teams who need complete control over their AI deployment, developers building AI products without per-token API costs, and organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, defense) that cannot send data to external services.
6. Qwen (Alibaba) — Best for Cost Efficiency and Coding
Qwen is the family of large language models developed by Alibaba Cloud. The latest release, Qwen 3.5 (February 2026), offers impressive benchmark performance at extremely competitive pricing, with open-weight models available under the Apache 2.0 license.
A note of caution is warranted here: Alibaba is a Chinese company, and while Qwen models can be self-hosted (addressing data privacy concerns), the hosted API version carries similar geopolitical data risks as DeepSeek. Users replacing DeepSeek for privacy reasons should self-host Qwen or choose a different alternative entirely.
Key Features
- Qwen 3.5 (released February 16, 2026): A hybrid MoE model with 397 billion total parameters and 17 billion active per forward pass. Claimed to outperform GPT-5.2, Claude Opus 4.5, and Gemini 3 Pro on several benchmarks.
- Visual agentic capabilities: Qwen 3.5 can independently control mobile and desktop applications, interpreting visual interfaces to complete tasks autonomously.
- 1 million token context window in the hosted version, supporting massive document processing.
- Thinking mode: Integrates web search, web extraction, and code interpreter tools for enhanced accuracy on complex tasks.
- Qwen3-Coder: A 480B-parameter MoE coding model trained on 7.5 trillion tokens (70% code-focused), available as open weights at $0 — compared to $2/million tokens for GPT-4.1 and $15/million for Claude Opus.
- Multilingual support: Over 200 languages including English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Russian, and Italian.
Pricing
- Open-weight models: Free to download and self-host under Apache 2.0.
- Hosted API via OpenRouter: Approximately $3.60 per million tokens for Qwen 3.5 — described as highly competitive for its capability level.
- Qwen3-Coder: Available at $0 as open weights, versus $2–$15/million tokens for comparable proprietary models.
- Qwen-Flash: The fastest, most affordable model in the family with flexible tiered pricing for simple tasks.
Privacy Warning
The hosted Qwen API routes data through Alibaba Cloud infrastructure. If you are moving away from DeepSeek specifically due to Chinese data concerns, treat hosted Qwen with similar caution. Self-hosting on your own infrastructure eliminates this concern.
Best For
Developers and cost-sensitive organizations who want frontier-level performance at very low cost, particularly for coding tasks. Self-hosted deployments give technical teams access to capable open-weight models without data sovereignty concerns.
7. Perplexity AI — Best for Research and Cited Answers
Perplexity AI occupies a distinct niche in the AI landscape: it is not primarily a chatbot but an AI-powered search and research engine. Every answer comes with source citations, making it ideal for fact-heavy tasks where accuracy and verifiability matter more than creative generation. For users who used DeepSeek for research and information gathering, Perplexity is a natural replacement.
Key Features
- Real-time web search with citations: Every answer includes inline source links, so you can verify claims directly rather than trusting the model’s memory alone.
- 300 Pro searches daily on the Pro plan — a significant jump from the free tier’s limits.
- Multi-model access on Pro: Choose between GPT-4o, Claude Opus, Gemini 2.5 Pro, o3-pro, and Grok-4 depending on the task. One subscription, multiple frontier models.
- File analysis: Upload PDFs, CSVs, and images for AI-assisted analysis with cited outputs.
- Image generation included on paid plans.
- Perplexity Labs: Converts text prompts into structured deliverables — reports, spreadsheets, dashboards, and mini web apps with citations and code.
- Perplexity Pages: Creates shareable, well-formatted research documents from any query.
Pricing
- Free: Basic search, limited daily searches, entry-level model access.
- Pro — $20/month or $200/year: 300 Pro searches/day, multi-model access, file analysis, image generation, Perplexity Labs.
- Max — $200/month: Unlimited advanced searches, no volume restrictions.
- Enterprise Pro — $40/seat/month: Team spaces, SSO, admin controls.
- Education Pro — $4.99/month after a free month for verified students.
- Search API — $5 per 1,000 requests for developers building search-powered applications.
Privacy
Perplexity is a US-based company. Standard privacy protections apply. Unlike DeepSeek, there is no concern about data routing through Chinese infrastructure, and the company is transparent about its data practices.
Best For
Researchers, journalists, students, analysts, and anyone who needs accurate, verifiable answers with sources. Perplexity’s strength is not raw generation quality — it is trustworthiness and transparency in information retrieval.
For more free AI options worth exploring, see our guide to the best free AI tools in 2026.
8. Grok — Best for Real-Time Data and X Integration
Grok is the AI assistant built by xAI, the company founded by Elon Musk. What makes Grok genuinely different from every other model on this list is its deep integration with X (formerly Twitter): it has real-time access to posts, trends, and breaking news on the platform, giving it a live pulse on current events that no other AI model can match.
Key Features
- Real-time X integration: Grok can search and synthesize live posts, trending topics, and breaking news from X in real time. For social listening, trend analysis, and current events, this is a unique capability.
- Grok-3 and Grok-4 models: xAI’s latest models, optimized for speed, complex computation, and expert-level scientific, coding, and mathematics reasoning.
- Think Mode: Allocates more compute for complex logical problem-solving, similar to OpenAI’s o-series reasoning models and Claude’s Extended Thinking.
- DeepSearch: An agentic web research mode that combines Grok’s reasoning with real-time search across the web and X simultaneously.
- Image and document analysis across all paid plans.
- Voice interaction built into the X and Grok mobile apps.
Pricing
- Limited free access through the X platform for X users.
- X Premium — $8/month: Basic Grok access included with X Premium subscription.
- X Premium+ — $16/month: More extensive Grok usage included.
- Grok Premium (standalone) — $30/month: Full access to Grok-3 and Grok-4, DeepSearch, Think Mode, image generation, and unlimited usage within fair use.
- API access: Available through xAI’s developer platform for developers building Grok-powered applications.
Privacy
xAI is a US-based company. Grok’s data practices are tied to X’s infrastructure, which has seen various policy changes since Elon Musk’s acquisition. Users should review the current xAI and X privacy policies before using Grok for sensitive tasks.
Best For
Social media professionals, journalists, marketers, and anyone who needs real-time intelligence on current events and social trends. Grok is also a strong choice for technical users who need heavy-duty reasoning on coding and STEM problems.
Which DeepSeek Alternative Is Best for You?
The right choice depends on your priorities. Here is a quick decision framework:
- You want the most capable all-rounder: Go with ChatGPT Plus ($20/month). It has the broadest feature set, the most integrations, and the largest ecosystem.
- Privacy is your top concern: Choose Claude Pro ($20/month). Anthropic’s privacy defaults are the strongest among major commercial AI providers, and Constitutional AI means you are not getting politically filtered responses.
- You live in Google’s ecosystem: Gemini AI Pro ($19.99/month) gives you AI that works inside the tools you already use daily.
- You need GDPR compliance (European user): Mistral AI is built under European law and offers Zero Data Retention on paid plans. Open-weight models are available for full self-hosting.
- You need complete data control: Self-host Llama 4. No third-party data handling of any kind.
- You need verifiable research with citations: Perplexity Pro ($20/month) is purpose-built for this use case.
- You need real-time social and news intelligence: Grok ($30/month) has live X integration that no other model can replicate.
- You want maximum performance at minimum cost (with technical setup): Self-host Qwen3-Coder or Llama 4 for $0 per token.
For free alternatives, our roundup of the best free ChatGPT alternatives covers strong options that cost nothing to get started. If you’re exploring options, check out our guide to free ChatGPT alternatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DeepSeek safe to use in 2026?
DeepSeek has faced significant regulatory scrutiny and security findings in 2026. Cybersecurity researchers discovered hidden code capable of transmitting user data to Chinese state-controlled infrastructure. Multiple governments — including Australia, Czech Republic, and South Korea — have banned DeepSeek from government devices or restricted downloads. For personal use, the risk depends on how sensitive your conversations are. For professional or enterprise use involving confidential data, most security professionals recommend avoiding DeepSeek entirely.
What is the best free DeepSeek alternative?
ChatGPT’s free tier offers access to GPT-4o mini with web browsing and file uploads. Claude’s free tier provides access to Claude 4.5 with a generous context window. Mistral’s Le Chat free tier is notably more generous than most competitors, allowing roughly 25 messages per session with flash answers, document uploads, and a code interpreter. All three are solid free starting points.
Can I use Llama as a DeepSeek replacement?
Yes. Meta’s Llama 4 models are capable open-weight alternatives to DeepSeek that you can download and run on your own hardware. Llama 4 Scout runs on a single Nvidia H100 GPU and supports a 10 million token context window. The commercial license allows use without royalties for organizations with under 700 million monthly users. Self-hosting eliminates all third-party data concerns.
Does Mistral AI have data privacy protections under GDPR?
Yes. Mistral AI is a French company operating under GDPR. Its Team and Enterprise plans offer Zero Data Retention, meaning your data is processed ephemerally and never stored on Mistral’s servers. Open-weight models can be self-hosted entirely within your own infrastructure for complete data sovereignty. This makes Mistral one of the strongest choices for European organizations replacing DeepSeek.
How does Claude compare to DeepSeek for privacy?
Claude and DeepSeek are at opposite ends of the privacy spectrum. DeepSeek stores all user data on servers in China, where it is subject to mandatory disclosure laws. Claude is built by Anthropic, a US company, with strong privacy defaults on paid plans — including the option to prevent your conversations from being used for model training. Claude’s Constitutional AI design also means it does not apply political censorship to responses, which is a direct contrast to DeepSeek’s documented content filtering.
Conclusion
DeepSeek offers real technical capability, but the risks associated with its data practices — Chinese government data access, hidden tracking code, and built-in content censorship — make it a poor choice for most professional and privacy-conscious users. The good news is that 2026 offers more capable, more transparent, and more trustworthy alternatives than ever before.
ChatGPT and Claude dominate for general use. Mistral and Llama lead for open-source and privacy-first deployments. Gemini wins for Google Workspace users. Perplexity excels at research. Grok stands alone for real-time social intelligence. We also cover this topic in our guide to ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini.
Whatever brings you to this search, there is a DeepSeek alternative that fits your needs without the data sovereignty concerns. Start with the free tiers of ChatGPT, Claude, or Mistral — all three are genuinely capable at no cost — and upgrade if your usage demands it.
For a broader comparison of leading AI models, see our in-depth ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek analysis or our full AI chatbot rankings for a complete view of the market.
Find the Perfect AI Tool for Your Needs
Compare pricing, features, and reviews of 50+ AI tools
Browse All AI Tools →Get Weekly AI Tool Updates
Join 1,000+ professionals. Free AI tools cheatsheet included.